jump to navigation

Are you receiving the proper amount in Workers’ Compensation benefits? March 12, 2008

Posted by Herb Chestnut in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
trackback

I had an Informal Conference today.  For those of you who have not gotten to this stage yet, an Informal Conference is your opportunity to discuss a problem you are having with your claim with the District Office of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP).  The conference is normally held by telephone and involves the claimant (you) or your attorney, the insurance carrier (or its attorney) and a claims examiner from the OWCP.  There is no special method required to request the conference.  A letter from one of the parties  identifying an issue to the District Office where you claim is pending is all that is required.  Even though the conference sounds, like its name, informal, it is a very important part of the process.

Getting back to my conference, one of the issues was average weekly wage (AWW).  Generally, AWW is calculated by first determining if the claimant worked substantially the whole year prior to the injury.  If so, was this work with the same employer or, at least, similar employment?  If so, the wages are simply calculated, divided by 52 and an AWW is determined.  There are several problems which rear their ugly heads, such as: what constitutes “substantially the whole year” and what type of job qualifies as “similar employment”.  According to cases decided under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Act (LHWCA), 37 weeks is the benchmark for the term “substantially the whole year”.  Therefore, if you have worked 37 out of the last 52 weeks, you may qualify. 

If it is determined that you have not worked substantially the whole year preceding your injury, the LHWCA gives several alternatives to determining your AWW.  These involve determining if you are a five or six day employee and what your daily rate of pay turns out to be.

Now that you have the background of the LHWCA, let me tell you where the problems arise.  First, most people who choose to work in Iraq, Afghanistan or other areas where defense bases are located, choose not to be there for an indefinite time.  Therefore, most claimants in Defense Base Act (DBA) cases, do not work substantially the whole year before their injury at the wages paid overseas. 

Secondly, insurance carriers are making a conscious effort to establish the date of injury at the earliest possible date.  This does not necessarily coincide with the date of disability.  Therefore, an injured worker may continue to serve his employer overseas only to see his much lower stateside wages be factored in to his AWW.  In the case I had today, the injured worker had a problem with his lungs.  This arose from the horrible air quality in Kabul, Afghanistan.  One doctor there attributed this to toxins, including airborne fecal matter, in the air.  My client first saw a doctor in September but did not stop working until the following August.  Instead of getting credit for trying to work, the insurer is contenting that, because he only worked for two months overseas, his stateside earnings should be used to determine his AWW.  The claimant’s stateside earnings were about half of his earnings in Afghanistan.  We argued that, because the employer put the employee at risk and paid him accordingly, he was entitled to the higher AWW.  This is not a novel theory;  it has been put forth in many DBA cases but the issue has still not been finally decided.  I had one case where the insurer calculated my client’s wages at less than $300.00 per week.

As you can see from the articles on this blog, insurers are doing everything possible to cut expenses and reap huge profits from the tragedy in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Where do they draw the line?  Should the OWCP and our courts allow this travesty of justice?  The answer of course is “NO” but how do we prevent it? 

We prevent it by fighting back.  Every one of the thousands of individual injured under the DBA should look into whether the insurer is paying the proper amount in wages.  Please do not under any circumstances think the insurance companies which handle these claims are going to be fair to you.  For the most part, they are going to do all that they can do to see that injured workers are going to be paid as little as possible.  They do this in a number of ways but it all starts with the average weekly wage.

Anyone who is currently receiving benefits or even those who received benefits in the past should determine whether there AWW was calculated properly.  Under the LHWCA, there is a provision which provides that if no method contained in the Act can fairly calculate a person’s AWW, then the OWCP or and Administrative Law Judge should do so.  I take this to mean that ones safety, risk and sacrifice should be taken into account.  You have already taken the risk.  You should be compensated for it.

For additional information on average weekly wage, compensation rate and the Defense Base Act, please visit our website.

About these ads

Comments»

1. The Defense Base Act - What is it and what rights does it provide? « The Defense Base Act Blog - March 18, 2008

[...] an employee’s wages from the year prior to the injury and dividing by 52. This is known as the average weekly wage (AWW). If the employee has worked in the same job for the entire period, the calculation is simple enough. [...]

2. Julene Amerson - July 25, 2008

How do you handle an issue where the employer terminated you due to getting injured? Are there provisions under the DBA to handle these instances of wrongful termination?

3. Jana - March 9, 2009

Are courts allowing the “New Blended Approach” for calculating Avg. Weekly wage due to work location, ie. IRAQ?

4. Herb Chestnut - May 11, 2009

I am sorry about the lack of response. I have recently changed the email address and that will hopefully resolve the problem. Please email directly at herbchestnut@bellsouth.net or call me at 770 795 7600.

Herb Chestnut


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.