Comments on: 1,264 civilian contractors have died in Iraq/Afghanistan according to most recent figures http://defensebaseactblog.com/2009/03/10/1264-civilian-contractors-have-died-in-iraqafghanistan-according-to-most-recent-figures/ News and Resources for U.S. contractors injured in Iraq, Afghanistan, and around the world Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:50:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Ivette giraldo http://defensebaseactblog.com/2009/03/10/1264-civilian-contractors-have-died-in-iraqafghanistan-according-to-most-recent-figures/#comment-460 Sat, 20 Feb 2010 03:46:42 +0000 http://defensebaseactblog.com/?p=232#comment-460 Richard scott bullard is my husband and I want to know if he is alive .

]]> By: Anonymous http://defensebaseactblog.com/2009/03/10/1264-civilian-contractors-have-died-in-iraqafghanistan-according-to-most-recent-figures/#comment-390 Wed, 20 May 2009 13:23:47 +0000 http://defensebaseactblog.com/?p=232#comment-390 Currently, Dyncorp is also being sued in court for the deaths of their subcontractors Dyncorp FZ-LLC in Iraq and Afghanistan. See Parlin v. Dyncorp (Iraq case) and Deuley et. al vs Dyncorp in Afghanistan. The subcontractor Dyncorp FZ-LLC provides the DBA coverage therefore they are not part of the lawsuit. Dyncorp International is the parent company and are NOT free from liability in TORT law. If you worked for Dyncorp FZ-LLC and have been injured or your loved one has been killed, contact a lawyer and refer them to these cases.

**Remember the DBA coverage you receive is not a “GIFT” from company. It is mandatory and is reimbursed in the contract by the governement/tax payers. The life insurance you may receive – the insurance premium is most likely reimbursed to the company by the government. No matter how well the company may be treating you, it may be just until the statutes of limitations pass so that you don’t file a lawsuit. Check your options and don’t play their game!)

Click on the following links:
http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/JJF/Opinions/Recent/Sep2008/08-107.pdf

http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/GMS/Opinions/Nov2008/06-605.pdf

]]>